Minimizing the Ft. Dix Terror Plot

by Greg McNeal

Wonkette has this to say about the Fort Dix terror plot arrests:

The FBI has successfully broken up yet another fiendish terrorist plot on American soil. These brave defenders of freedom have once again ensured that Americans can rest easy, safe from the threat of a couple guys buying some guns and trying to… take over an Army base???

* * * *

Ok. So, the plot was: six dudes from New Jersey buy some guns and storm Fort Dix. The Fort Dix that is full of lots and lots of Army reservists with way, way more guns. And, like, extensive military training and shit. Yes, thank god these terrorists have been caught and locked up before they could be killed within minutes of deciding to carry out the dumbest fucking terrorist plot we’ve ever heard of.

Ann Althouse makes a good point in response:

Now, I don’t blame bloggers for riffing impetuously on anything that sounds stupid, but of course, you must realize that the idea of hijacking four planes with boxcutters and knocking down buildings would seem like “the dumbest fucking terrorist plot” if it hadn’t happened.

I’d go further here and say that Wonkette’s post is one of the dumbest I’ve ever read.

First, if 6 guys made it through the gate with RPG’s and automatic weapons they would have done a significant amount of damage. I think I echo the experience of most servicemembers when I say that, day to day, unless I was headed to the range (which for most units at Fort Dix would be once every 6 months) my rifle was locked up in the arms room, and my ammunition was not accessible without a separate trip to the depot. The only armed people on base with live ammo were the MP’s at the gate and on patrol. That’s if Fort Dix has MP’s, it’s possible security is run by armed private security guards. Bottom line, if these 6 “dudes” made it through the gate they would have had a lot of chances to kill a lot of people.

Second, how hard would it be to get through Fort Dix security? Well apparently every pizza delivery car was allowed through with a paper pass issued to the pizzerias. No scrutiny beyond an easily duplicable piece of paper, unless a vehicle was selected for a random search. This plot could have happened had it not been broken up by authorities. Further, contrast Fort Dix security with the security procedures at Dover Air Force Base, according to the complaint (which no doubt Wonkette read in detail) Dover was avoided because it was too heavily guarded. This story details some of the different procedures:

Commercial delivery traffic was relocated to a southern gate. Congress approved money for a new, tougher command post. Pizza shop deliveries — used by terrorists, according to federal documents, to gain firsthand knowledge of Fort Dix — are banned entirely here. Troops have to trudge out to the main gate administration to fetch fast-food deliveries.

Third, Wonkette referring to the FBI says “These brave defenders of freedom have once again ensured that Americans can rest easy, safe from the threat of a couple guys buying some guns.” This sort of characterization leads me to believe that Wonkette really hasn’t read much into the story beyond a few paragraphs from the New York Times, that or she just chose to ignore all of the serious facts alleged in the complaint. Moreover, while it’s tough to infer tone from a blog post, my reading makes it clear that she does not believe the FBI agents and informants who infiltrated this group are “brave defenders of freedom.” I find this sideswipe to be pretty obnoxious. Reading the complaint, it becomes clear that these individuals were commited to their cause, willing to kill for it and willing to die for it.

Maybe in Wonkette’s circles it is common to watch jihadist training and recruitment videos, host viewings of videos depicting the targeting and killing of U.S. military personnel, conduct surveillaince on multiple U.S. military installations, plan an operation designed to kill the greatest number of people, conduct live fire training for that operation, and then seek out arms dealers to supply the operation with automatic weapons and RPG’s. That may not seem serious to her, I on the other hand think those acts alleged above are very serious, and am thankful that the people involved in the investigation were brave enough to infiltrate that group. Those “six dudes from New Jersey” were six dedicated terrorists, motivated by calls to jihad and willing to kill to achieve their goals. Good job to the FBI and related authorities for breaking it up, and shame on Wonkette for minimizing their efforts.

Wednesday, May 9th, 2007 9:16 am | Posted in: AIDP Blog, Counterterrorism, Criminal Law
Print This Post Print This Post | Share This

1 Comment for the post: Minimizing the Ft. Dix Terror Plot

Trackback URLPermalink URL

Comment #1

patricksodonnell said,

As critical as I may be at times of this or that aspect of the government’s ‘war on terror’ or our inability to understand the history and politics of the Middle East or the variegated role of Islam around the world, I too am thankful that these would-be or alleged (innocent until proven guilty) terrorists were infiltrated and apprehended. I do recall that not long ago the FBI or other law enforcement agencies would infiltrate groups and its agents would be the ones advocating or encouraging this or that illegal action (e.g. with the SDS or the Black Panther Party); I trust that this is not at all the the case in this instance. By all appearances this is a good example of law enforcement doing what it is supposed to do and we should indeed be grateful. In general, I look at such matters on a ‘case by case’ basis irregardless of my dispositional suspicion regarding our national security apparatus (thus, some cases my serve to confirm my suspicions, others may not).

May 12, 2007 at 1:03 am

Leave Your Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment. Log In.

You must register to comment with a valid email address to which a password will be mailed. Additionally, your first comment will be moderated before it will appear. Not registered yet? Click here. Thank you!

The AIDP is the oldest association of criminal law specialists in the world and one of the oldest scientific associations. This blog serves as a discussion site for all things law, with a focus upon criminal law, comparative criminal justice, international criminal law, international humanitarian law, war crimes, international criminal tribunals, human rights and counterterrorism law & policy.

The Bloggers

Michael Scharf President AIDP American National SectionBiography/Contact LawFac Page SSRN

Mark Drumbl Vice President AIDP American National Section Biography/Contact LawFac Page SSRN

Christopher Blakesley Vice President AIDP American National Section Biography/Contact LawFac Page

Michael Kelly Director of Studies AIDP American National Section Biography/Contact LawFac Page SSRN

Gregory McNeal Director of Studies AIDP American National Section Biography/Contact LawFac Page SSRN

Dorean Koenig Secretary AIDP American National Section Biography/Contact LawFac Page

David Crane Biography/Contact LawFac Page

Amos Guiora Biography/Contact LawFac Page SSRN

Linda Malone Biography/Contact LawFac Page

Michael Newton Biography/Contact LawFac Page SSRN

Jordan Paust Biography/Contact LawFac Page SSRN

David Scheffer Biography/Contact LawFac Page

Laura Dickinson Biography/Contact LawFac Page

Leila Sadat Biography/Contact

Bloggers' Books

Links

Search

Subscribe

Enter your email address to subscribe to the AIDP Blog feed via e-mail:

Subscribe to the AIDP Blog's Comment Feed.

Int.l Criminal Law News

The latest international criminal law news from the Google news reader:

Meta Information

Statistics

In total, there have been 13069 unique visitors to the AIDP Blog. Within the past hour, this blog has had 0 hits.

AIDP Blog | American National Section | Terms | Site by Blog What Design

AIDP Blog | American National Section | Terms | Site by Blog What Design

Close
E-mail It